More red and some reverse psychology

   Previous             Browse archive             Next    


NIKON D70 - 1/8 sec, f4.5 at 70mm

We're doing some hiring at the office at the moment. Which means interviewing people and reference checking. I've been pondering on the reference checking bit lately.

If the person is a real ratbag or completely clueless would their boss give him (we've only interview guys so far so all examples will be hims) a glowing reference just to make sure he leaves? Or would the boss tell us the truth? What if the company is really crap or the boss is about as useful as a piece of festering dung, and the recruit is really good but the boss couldn't tell his arse from his elbow?

What if the person we are interviewing is really great, would his boss tell us he's next to bloody useless so that we don't hire that person and the boss gets to keep him? A cunning ploy to retain good staff.

Now heres the tricky bit. What if the boss thinks we know that he's telling us the potential new recruit is really bad so that we don't hire him. Reverse psychology. So instead tells us he's really good, so we think he's really bad. What if we know he knows we know that telling us the wrong thing so that we do the right thing, which is really the wrong thing? Or what if he tells us the right thing so that we do the wrong thing which is really the right thing for him and not for us?

Perhaps verbal reference checks are just a plain waste of time and we should go with our gut feel that we got within 15 seconds of clapping eyes on the interviewee. Bugger them. If that boss was any good he'd be working for us already anyway so obviously we can't believe a single word that comes out of his mouth. He's likely not smart enough anyway to play reverse reverse pyschology on us. There ya go. Another lesson from Dave's Management School.

Post Meta

Posted: Wednesday, 25 May, 2005 21:30

Captured: 2005:05:25 17:35:55

Add your own comment

  • i hate being reference-checked. who knows what the crazy company will ask?
    manda - Wednesday, 25 May, 2005 23:46
  • strange thing is that in New Zealand you are not allowed (by law) to give a person a bad reference no matter what they have done.
    MA - Thursday, 26 May, 2005 22:23
  • Just use the appearance barometer: Sales - are they wearing a tie? Design - does their shirt have a pattern? Programming - do they have facial growth? Never fails.
    Sean - Friday, 27 May, 2005 15:58
  • Sean, you have a barometer for every occasion! I loved your <a href="">beer fridge barometer</a>!
    Dave - Friday, 27 May, 2005 16:10
  • Well, a tie means you're "tied" to the company (really), and design is fundamentally about pattern recognition, and programming, well, you know: what Meatloaf says
    Sean - Friday, 27 May, 2005 17:01
  • Umm, what does Meatloaf say?
    Dave - Friday, 27 May, 2005 17:56

All commments are held for moderated before publication so your words will not appear until we are ready.